[?] Subscribe To This Site

XML RSS
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Subscribe with Bloglines


Home
Website Tools BLOG (Site Web Log)
Reference Material
Free e-mail "E-Zine"
Recommended Sites
Add Your Site Link
About Your Host
Your Personal WebPage
Submit An Article
Contact Me
Website Foundations Church, State & Law Pics
Mission Statement
Our Guiding Ethos
Critical Thinking
On Thinking Catholic
The Catholic Thinker
Cultural Morality
Catholic Culture
Dogmas of Secularism
Indifferentism
Culture Wars
Battle Lines
Constitutional America
The American Ideal
Scientism: Fads, Straw-Villains and Shell-Game Trickery The Modernist Heresy
Enlightenment=Scientism
The Darwinism Fad
The Freudianism Fad
The Marxism Fad
Radiocarbon Dating
The Femi-Nazi Front
The Eco-Nazi Front
The Homo-Nazi Front
HIV=AIDS=DEATH Hoax
The Great Communist Lie
This ain't Health Care
Global Consensual Fraud
The 2008 Bush-Obama Great Depression 2008 Financial Crisis
2008 Election Forecast
2008 Marxist Infiltration
Marxist Seeds of Disaster
2008 Obama Ethos
2008 Political Crisis
2008 World Economy
2008 Obama Election
Obamunism The Marxism of Obama
Deliverance From Evil
In Defense of Obama
Values Vs Ethos
Up From Obamunism
Sarah Palinism Why Hatred of Palen?
A Palin-Parker Ticket?
Elitism Versus Palinism
Cafeteria Catholicism Cafe-Catholicism 101
Cafeteria Catholic 1
Cafeteria Catholic 2
Cafeteria Catholic 3
Cafeteria Catholic 4
Cafeteria Catholic 5
Major Moral Issues Population Problem Hoax
Artificial Contraception
Abortion in America
Masturbation Industry
The Church and Slavery
Forums Cafeteria Catholic Forum
Pro Catholic Forum
Pro American Forum
Catholic Issues The 1962 Latin Mass
The Liturgical Wars
Eucharistic Presence
Papal Infallibility
Perpetual Virginity
Catholic Annulment
Catholic Prayer
This Rotten Church
Truth versus Evil
Authority Meets Truth
The Little Red Hen
Of Sheep and Men
Trashing Pius XII
Catholic Orthodoxy
Our Lady of Siluva
Historical Critical Crap
Freedom, Love and Evil
The Nature of Freedom
Right Versus Wrong
Catholic Communism
Proper Catechesis
American Issues American Constitution
Leftist Useful Idiocy
Pro-American Definition
Anti-American Definition
Anti-American Politics
Anti Anti-Americanism
Warning all Bourgeoisie
Marxist Fundamentals
Papal Global Economics
Us Arrogant Americans
Our Political Landscape
Bush Family Class
Colonial Communism
Oil Spill Crisis
War and Peace Gun Control
The Necessity Of  War
Limited War Doctrine
For God and Country
Hard, Cold History The Inquisition Myth
The Galileo Inquisitions
The Medieval Crusades
Byzantine 4th Crusade
The Godless Left
Rabbi Kahane's Letter
Solzhenitsyn Speaks
Jefferson Speaks
World Revolution Again
Islam Vs. All Other Forms of Government Islam and the Jews
Islam Opposes America
Murderous Islam
A Kinder Gentler Islam
The Islamic Theocracy
Outlawing Sharia
Israel Stands Alone
Israel: Islam's Nemisis
Faith & Reason Vs Islam
Islam Is The Enemy.
Mainstream News: Our Anti-American Propaganda Machine The Vietnam War
The SLIMC Vs. the Truth
Bush Lied People Died
Media Lies and Liars
Daily Gaggle Cartoon
Tet Lie Redux
Cronkite Lies Again
Site Definitions: Darwinism Defined
Freudianism Defined
Marxism Defined
Conservatism Defined
Definition of Libertarian
Capitalism Defined
Subsidiarity Defined
Communism Defined
Socialism Defined
Democracy Defined
Republic Defined
Pure Democracy Defined
Pure Socialism Defined
Social Democracy Def.
Site Rollover Links: GESGOEAOT
PEWAG
TTRSTF
TTRSPTF
TTRSJTF
SNRTACBT
STNSEACPB
WDN
SLIMC
BMDFP
HBAACOTE
ACLU
FLORMPORIF
MEJTML
MPAV
WBESSWG
Our Arguments & Open Challenges Arguments Pro and Con
Refuting Darwin
Refuting Freud
Refuting Marx
This Christian Nation
Church, State and Law
Opposing Libertarianism
Legislating Morality
"Private Matter" Relgion
The Sexual Revolution
Open Homosexuality
Refuting Pro-Choice
Opposing Sharia Law
Socialized Medicine
Socialized Education
Fair Tax Revolution
Against Earmarks
Against Unions
Affirmtive Action Racism
Against Diversity
Disgusting Moderation
Against Fads
Our National Language
Against Dispair
Against Death Penalty
Against Income Controls
The Anti-American UN
Scope of Government
Fatal False Premises
Topical Articles & Essays National People-hood
Atheizing America
Redirection of Ethos?
National Existence
Worldly Village-ism
It's Not MY Language
Chastity vs Sophistication
Racial Victimology
Poor Vic's Old Truck
Illegal Aliens and Taxes
Illegal Alien Problems
See SITE MAP on Home Page for all past articles The Way Out

The Nature of Freedom: Free Will is a requirement for Love; Free Will is also required for Evil

Vic Biorseth, March 23, 2006
http://www.Thinking-Catholic-Strategic-Center.com

Which presents quite a dichotomy. Remember the old, old, Baltimore Catechism? It was a great question-and-answer format treatment of correct Catholic teaching. And one of the questions in it was, of course, the why are we here? What is our purpose? question. And the given answer was, and still is, to know, love and serve God in this life, and to be happy with Him in the next. That seemingly simple question and answer carries within itself, and begins to plumb, the most profound depths of Judao-Christian thought and Western Culture philosophy.

It presents, as a premise, that God wants man to love Him.

A huge percentage of Judao-Christian inquiry inevitably leads us back to that foundational premise. From the little child asking his or her first probing questions, to the battle-weary veteran asking how could a good God allow such evil to exist? to the grief-stricken mourner regarding the untimely death of someone truly good, to why do bad things happen to good people? to where did evil come from? and on, and on, and on. It all comes back to that first premise, and it has to do with the nature of true love.

God wants us to love Him, not act like we love Him, and not just bow and scrape before Him, and not just submit to Him or to His will; He wants us to really love Him. He could just as easily have made us robots, without free will, to act as though we loved Him. But He gave us free will. Which means we are free to not love Him.

And what is love, in the absence of free will? If it is not freely given by someone in full possession of free will, then, I submit, it is not love; it is something else. True love, by its very nature, demands, as an absolute prerequisite, the existence of free will. Love is, at its deepest root, a decision or a choice that must be freely made, in the presence of other options.

And that is how evil came into the world.

If we are free to love God, then we are equally free to reject His love for us, and to not love Him, and to do whatever we damn well please. Here we have the very beginning point of the notion of sin, which is, rejecting, or saying no, to God. All sin of all variety is a form of that rejection.

It may be argued that man, by his poor choices, was not the first to bring evil into the world. Tradition of the ancients teaches that Angels also had free will, and that Lucifer, creature (creation) of God that he was, chose to try and set himself up as equal to God, and had his great fall. St. Michael, whose name itself was the challenge "Who is like unto God?" prevailed in a great heavenly battle against Lucifer / Satan. In Luke 10:18, Jesus says "I saw Satan fall like lightening from the sky"; from that and from Matthew 4:8-9 we know that he fell to Earth and not to Hell, and that he had, and has, power to rule here. This is where he operates. His power is personified as the great tempter; so long as we truly have free will, we can exercise self control, and we can resist temptation.

But many if not most forms of sin are addictive, which is to say, enslaving, which means the loss of free will. The more we sin, the more we sin, until we loose complete sight of the love of God, and we forget the foundational premise.

God respects us too much to interfere with our free will. It is ours to use, or to abuse.

Does God damn us to eternal Hell, or do we damn ourselves, by our free will choices? Do we properly lead others toward the free-will love of God, or away from it? Do we induce others to sin, either actively or by our own example?

The question before Adam involved saying yes to God in all circumstances, or to saying yes to the tempter, which is another way of saying no to God.

I submit that if we are blessed with intellect and cognitive ability, then we are supposed to use it appropriately. If you have made poor life choices and wound up in an unhappy place, do not blame God. Even if some external evil brought you to an unhappy place, through no fault of your own, again, do not blame God. He brought free will into the world, hoping for love; He did not bring evil into the world.

We did.

All God wanted was the for man to freely and truly love Him. That's it.

Seek the Truth; find the Way; live the Life. Please God, and live forever.

Reference Material

Return to HOME PAGE

Build/Host/Maintain Your Own Personal Website using SBI! (Advertisement)


Comments



Please note the language and tone already established in this Website. This is not the place to stack up vulgar one-liners and crude rejoinders. While you may support, oppose or introduce any position or argument, your comments must meet our standards of logical rigor and of civil discourse. We will not participate in trading insults, and we will not tolerate participants trading insults with each other. Participants should not be thin-skinned or over sensitive to criticism, but should be prepared to defend their arguments when challenged. If you don’t really have a coherent argument or counter-argument of your own, sit down and don’t embarrass yourself. If you have something serious to contribute to the conversation, please keep it civil. We apologize to religious conservative thinkers for the need to even say these things.


ADD COMMENT
Please note that all fields followed by an asterisk must be filled in.
Name / Pseudo-Name:*
E-mail Address:
City / State / Country:
Comment:*

Please enter the word that you see below.

  


footer for thinking catholic blog 4 page