Dear Vic and others who frequent this page:
By John Felland, Friday, December 18, 2009
I have read your articles about Obama and your claims of what his motivations are and about his leadership. I'm reminded of a fearful point of view and name calling that can be very dangerous. Much of this is done in the name of Christianity and personal belief systems. How do you know what his motivations are? Facts are facts. We have been years in the making of this economic situation we are and in fact, it has probably been over the last 25-30 years. Many leaders on both sides of the aisle have contributed to our state along with giant corporations who have moved many jobs out of our country. I am so tired of the rants of people like you who name call and use such inflammatory language. What did you think we should do when Wall Street and the financial industry was on its knees along with the other connections to investments in other countries. Bold steps have to be taken to prevent a collapse. Now banks are starting to pay back the money and the car companies are recovering. We have millions of people out of work and many who are going hungry in our nation. I don't hear any solutions from your camp for this. I doubt that you have provided any. What's wrong with you? You shield yourself behind accusations and have no offer of solutions.
Reference Material
Return to HOME PAGE
Build/Host/Maintain Your Own Personal Website using SBI! (Advertisement)
Comments
Date: Fri Dec 18 21:05:40 2009
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:
Mr. Felland:
I have no idea what you mean by “this page” since your entry came in through the “Submit an Article” page rather than any comment from the bottom of any specific page on this website, which contains hundreds of pages. I know it can be hard for some to figure out how to submit a comment from the page they’re on. I’m guessing that you have read some small part of one page, and then got all exercised and flew into a blue snit or something.
I like name calling so long as it is honest. I am a Christian and I have personal belief systems, of which I am quite proud. You may call me triumphalist and/or arrogant if you wish; I don’t mind at all; that is what I am. How I know what Mr. Obama’s motivations are stem from his own written and spoken words, as quoted verbatim in the Marxism of Obama page, among other pages. Yes, facts are facts. You should pay closer attention to them.
This crisis has indeed been in the making for considerably more than a mere “25-30 years,” as shown in the 2008 Financial Crisis page, which begins with President Hoover.
If you had read any of this site in any depth at all you would know that what I think “we” should have done when Wall Street and the Financial Industry was on it’s knees was, exactly – nothing whatsoever. All of Wall street would not have failed. All of Financial Industry would not have failed. Whatever banks or businesses or institutions that would have failed, should have failed, in the natural process of the free market.
What’s wrong with me is that I am a dirty rotten Capitalist exploiter. I shield myself behind nothing; I stand in the middle of the open field. The solution I offer is to leave the free market alone; it can take care of itself. Free markets do not fail. Controlled markets fail. Planned economies fail.
Government is not the solution. Government is the problem. Interfering with private commerce is not what we constituted our government to do. It is, in a word, unconstitutional.
Read on.
Regards,
Vic
PS: See also the 2008 Obama Ethos page. Note that the ethos of America is the Judao-Christian Ethos of Western Civilization, which provides our common American sense of right and wrong that defines us as an identifiable people, and provides the foundation for our Constitution and the basis of our representative civil law. Morality and moral norms come out of religion, not out of government. Obama is our first clearly anti-American President, he is clearly a MEJTML and his guiding ethos is alien to us. It is the guiding ethos of BMDFP and Marxists, which is why I wrote the Deliverance from Evil page.
Date: Wed Jan 20 13:14:56 2010
From: Ahmed
Email:
Location:
Comment:
Explain please why you call self “dirty rotten capitalist exploiter” I do not understand. Thank you.
Date: Wed Jan 20 18:48:03 2010
From: Vic Biorseth
Comment:
Ahmed:
It is a weirdo-American form of sarcasm or sarcastic humor. I call myself what my opponents call me before they get the chance. I call myself a capitalist exploiter because I am a sometimes landlord, an on-again off-again private business man, an investor, etc., and an active participant in free market capitalism, all of which activities are despised by Leftists.
I use the term affectionately, since I am one, and proud of it. In fact, I am the Chief Resident Capitalist Exploiter in our house. I am also the Chief Resident Gun Nut, the Chief Resident Religious Nut and the Chief Resident Representative of the Lunatic Right Wing Conservative Fringe. All of these terms are used with affection, and I feel an immediate affinity with anyone labeled with any of those terms.
I suppose I am also a Triumphalist Roman Catholic; not only that, but proud of it. I am proud of all the labels the Left seek to tar us with. I wear them as badges of honor. I am a free American citizen who intends to remain what I am. Everything I love, honor and stand for, they despise. Everything they promote and drive toward, I despise. The differences are too great for compromise.
All of these labels accentuate and spotlight the fact that there are glaringly obvious differences between Leftists and me.
Thank God.
Regards,
Vic
Please note the language and tone already established in this Website. This is not the place to stack up vulgar one-liners and crude rejoinders. While you may support, oppose or introduce any position or argument, your comments must meet our standards of logical rigor and of civil discourse. We will not participate in trading insults, and we will not tolerate participants trading insults with each other. Participants should not be thin-skinned or over sensitive to criticism, but should be prepared to defend their arguments when challenged. If you don’t really have a coherent argument or counter-argument of your own, sit down and don’t embarrass yourself. If you have something serious to contribute to the conversation, please keep it civil. We apologize to religious conservative thinkers for the need to even say these things.

|