The Current American Democratic Party Platform

America's major Leftist Party and it's official propaganda arm, the SLIMC, reveal their true agenda, in all its glory

Vic Biorseth, http://www.Thinking-Catholic-Strategic-Center.com

From time to time we need to take a good look at the current positions of the Democratic Party. This seems a good time.

First- just because there were some military intrusions into her territory to kill, kidnap and ambush her soldiers, and just because her citizens are being killed by rockets fired from foreign soil, Israel is vastly over-reacting and raising the violence level and, horror of horrors, intruding into the offending countries.

Note, for the unaware: Military intrusion happens on a two way street.

Ask any member of Hizballah, or any member of Hamas, this very simple yes-or-no question:

Does a Jew living in current day Israel have any right to continue to live?

I'm sure you will agree that the question is quite direct, very simple, and quite easy to answer. And, when asked of any member of Hizballah or any member of Hamas, the answer will always be a resounding No. In their view, a Jew - any Jew - living in Israel most certainly does not have a right to continue to live. "Death to Israel" has become a key element, perhaps even a key defining element in the cultural-religious ethos of Islam today. In point of fact, in their view, any Jew living anywhere is on shaky ground. Hizballah and Hamas, both, maintain as their primary goal if not their main purpose for being the complete annihilation and elimination of the state of Israel.

And what do we hear from the Leftist SLIMC on behalf of the Democratic Party?

There absolutely must be an immediate cease fire; there absolutely must be negotiations if there is ever to be peace. All sides must come together in good faith and reach some compromise.

For the individual Jew, the beginning point of any compromise he might make is the Hizballah / Hamas position that he needs to die, for the very simple reason that they all want him to be dead. Perhaps he could negotiate with them, that they might just cut off his legs, or maybe his arms, or maybe an arm and a leg, but allow him to continue to live. How's that for a compromise? In the American Leftist view, if the Jew had any decency at all, he should be willing to negotiate and compromise for his right to continue to live.

For the nation of Israel, the beginning point of any compromise she might make is the Hizballah / Hamas position that she needs to be annihilated and cease to exist, for the simple reason that they all want her to disappear and not exist any more. Perhaps she could negotiate with them, that they might just kill half the Jews and let the other half live. And maybe that they might extinguish just half the sovereign state of Israel, and allow it to be occupied by people who want all the rest of the Jews to be dead, and all the rest of Israel to cease to exist. How's that for a compromise? In the American Leftist view, if Israel had any decency at all, she should be willing to negotiate and compromise for her right to continue to exist.

The argument is made that Hamas is part of the government in Palestine (Gaza) and Hizballah is part of the government in Lebanon. So what? Hitler was part of the legitimate government in Germany. Whether they are voted in or not, whether they are in charge or not, no matter how many or how important the governmental seats they hold, they remain anti-Semitic murderers and terrorists committed to the death of Jews and to the death of Israel. A murderer in charge of a country remains a murderer. You cannot negotiate for your life with a murderer who is committed to the task of murdering you, no matter what his political rank may be, or how many votes he got.

I talked about this some in the Israel Vs. the World essay, and previous to that in the Israeli Conflict essay. The overall topic is addressed in its own dedicated webpage, the Islam and the Jews page.

Here's the bottom line. The Jews, whether anyone likes it or not, have planted their flag in their own ancient homeland, which is Israel. There were already a lot of them living there, as there were for thousands of years. Hundreds of thousands more have migrated there from all sorts of places where they were periodically if not persistently persecuted, for being Jews.

They are Israel now. They are not moving. They will run no more.

They will not stand by or ever again become so weak as to allow themselves to be herded or moved or collected or mistreated or murdered any more, by anyone. Whether Hizballah, Hamas, Syria, Iran, the American Democratic Party, the SLIMC, or anyone else likes it or not, the Jews are not going to compromise on their right to continue to live, and Israel is not going to compromise on her right to continue to exist. And if the Dems don't like it, they can lump it. That's the way it is.

I'd say that the Leftist-Dem "cease fire; negotiate" position was downright stupid if I didn't suspect that there is a hidden sinister undercurrent there. There always seems to be an anti-Semitic current among the philosophical Marxists and the ends-justify-the-means-ers (which, incidentally, includes a lot of so-called secular Jews. Go figure.) It would make about as much sense as trying to negotiate with a rabid pit-bull loose in a nursery, or, perhaps worse, with any of the new Liberal Catholic Liturgists. America, and all nations of men of good will, ought to support Israel with money, arms, and, if need be, with blood. So long as Israel holds the moral high ground, she should be saluted and sustained in her great trials. And it should be recognized by all by now that her sworn enemies are our sworn enemies, too.

Second- Bush had the unmitigated temerity to ignore all of TTRSTF and veto Stem Cell Research legislation.

What the Leftist-Dems want is legislation that would allow TTRSTF to use, create and/or gestate human beings for the sole purpose of later "harvesting" of organs, tissue, body parts and so forth. Making people for the parts, to be cannibalized by other people who are somehow deemed more worthy. (Fetus Farming Prohibition Act (S. 3504))

Another Leftist-Dem goal is to allow TTRSTF at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) not only to pioneer new ways to generate stem cells, but to use their scientism and scientistic ethics to determine when and whether what has been created is an actual human embryo. Scientism and scientism alone determines who is and who is not a human being. In the future, after all the scientistic technical bugs are worked out, the task can be turned over to petty bureaucrats. (Alternative Pluripotent Stem Cell Therapies Enhancement Act (S. 2754))

And, yet another Leftist-Dem goal is to permit federal funds to be used by TTRSTF to do embryonic stem cell research using "excess" human embryos obtained from previously Dem-sponsored in-vitro fertilization clinics. This is legislation that openly admits that it holds the object of the legislation to be excess human beings. (Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act of 2005 (H.R. 810))

History has recorded, and re-recorded, and re-re-recorded the results of the adoption of moral relativism that comes about only at the expense of critical thinking, the recognition of objective truths, and adherence to any fixed moral standard. No thinking Catholic can accept this infinitely variable "morality". Science, like politics, has no business seeking to establish or modify morality; that is the domain of theology.

But, the Leftist-Dem position is, more or less, Godless, and does not recognize (or opposes) the entire field of theology. In their elitist and absolutely worldly self-perceived "wisdom" they take it upon themselves to make morality, and they hope to eventually be able to impose it upon others.

The Left-most political position is always, just like the U.N., Godless, and thus would always be randomly oriented, pointless and purposeless in the absence of circumstantial, quick-draw, invented on the spot points and purposes and directions.

I spoke about some of the Democratic Party positions previously in the American Political Landscape essay. They always, always, try to show that their political positions are in agreement with the supposed majority of Americans. They don't do that by use of the ballot box, but rather by use of the carefully controlled popularity poll, as I said in the MSM Instant Popularity Poll essay. In point of fact, their political positions are usually aligned with the minority. Just about every time we go to the polls, some issue or other proves again that the majority of American citizens remain moral, in the old, Western Culture meaning of that term. But, the Democratic Party, i.e., The World, is gaining ground.

The Democratic Party was the Party of slavery forever. Then it was the Party of segregation forever. Then it morphed into the Party of abortion forever. The same Party that defends the unregulated abortion industry defends the masturbation industry as free speech. It's the Party that seeks to legislate, regulate and control, by Executive Order, the weather, as seen in the Eco-Nazism page. And the Democratic Party seeks to make America into the New Sodom, as you can see in the Homo-Nazism page. I could keep this up all day.

I submit that you cannot find a single moral issue that the Democratic Party is not predominantly on the immoral side of.

But there remains such a thing as Objective Truth which is eternal, and is completely independent of the mind of man. Through this Objective Truth, there remains such a thing as right and wrong, and the human mind has the ability to tell the difference. Think about it.

Seek the Truth. Find the Way. Live the Life.

May you please God, and may you live forever.

Reference Material

Return to Web Site Log (Blog) page

Return to HOME PAGE

Build/Host/Maintain Your Own Personal Website using SBI! (Advertisement)

Please note the language and tone already established in this Website. This is not the place to stack up vulgar one-liners and crude rejoinders. While you may support, oppose or introduce any position or argument, your comments must meet our standards of logical rigor and of civil discourse. We will not participate in trading insults, and we will not tolerate participants trading insults with each other. Participants should not be thin-skinned or over sensitive to criticism, but should be prepared to defend their arguments when challenged. If you don’t really have a coherent argument or counter-argument of your own, sit down and don’t embarrass yourself. If you have something serious to contribute to the conversation, please keep it civil. We apologize to religious conservative thinkers for the need to even say these things.