Website Tools Catholic Issues: The Good; The Bad Political Issues: The Good; The Bad Refuting the Published Theories of Charles Darwin Refuting the Theories of Freud, Jung and Kinsey Refuting the Outright Fraud of Marxism Refuting the Outright Fraud of Islam Refuting Comrade Obama, Peace be upon him The Bush-Obama Great Depression of Year 2008 Refuting Marxist Mainstream Media Journalism: the Professional Liars Club Refuting Scientism - Hayek's term for the uncritical consensus of elitist pseudo-scientists. Refuting the Sexual Revolution as a bogus enslaver of mankind. The unavoidable voting thirds of every population Cutting SPENDING, Bureaucracy, Administration. Website Foundations Scientism: Fads, Straw-Villains and Shell-Game Trickery The 2008 Bush-Obama Great Depression Obamunism Sarah Palinism Cafeteria Catholicism Major Moral Issues Forums Catholic Issues American Issues War and Peace Hard, Cold History Islam Vs. All Other Forms of Government Mainstream News: Our Anti-American Propaganda Machine Site Definitions: Site Rollover Links: Our Arguments & Open Challenges Topical Articles & Essays See SITE MAP on Home Page for all past articles
(Refuting Free Love is a collection of right-hand-column linked articles related to the subject at hand. This is to refute the whole so-called sexual revolution and the ideas of “free” sexuality – it loses souls, degrades man and destroys society.)
Turning away from God. It always begins the same way; it always ends the same way. When man turns away from God, nothing good comes of it, unless and until he turns back. It always ends badly. Making oneself “free” of God always winds up involving a return to the ways of Sodom and Gomorrah, just as the dog returns to his own vomit.
The Sexual Revolution of the 60s was just another manifestation of the “Enlightenment” thinking that pretended to be a freeing of the mind from ancient superstitions and old taboos. It was the only part of the 60s and 70s Marxist revolution in America that succeeded, or at least that succeeded above ground; the rest of the Marxist revolution, defeated for the time being, went back underground, or at least became more quiet, and began biding its time and rebuilding itself, mostly in academia.
But the Make Love, Not War part of it not only survived, but grew, and spread. It destroyed a lot of souls and led a major portion of the younger participants into sexual slavery of some sort, under the banner of Free Love. They thought they were being freed from something. But all the various practices they began to participate in have an addictive element to them, and a malicious psychological twisting of the rational mind. It moves man away from common sense and the ability to tell simple right from wrong. Remember when the “Sit-Ins” became “Love-Ins”? Remember Woodstock?
In this not-so-small part of that revolution, the revolutionaries didn’t really know what the whole revolution was about; for them, it just became a wild party involving drugs, booze and sex. It was a pure pleasure binge, nothing more and nothing less. There was an anti-war – pacifist element to it, in which massive numbers of young minds had been mal-educated into believing that America was somehow the aggressor nation in the Vietnam War. So, they would wave anti-war banners for awhile, and then screw for awhile, and then smoke dope for awhile.
Look to the linked articles in the right hand column of this page for how all this “freedom” came to be accepted in a Christian nation. Today, in the so-called “Occupy Wall Street” demonstrations, once again we can clearly see that most of the “useful idiot” revolutionaries are clueless about what they are even doing there, except for those who are paid to be there. And, of course, except for the professional Marxist revolutionaries, anarchists and terrorists scattered in among them. It’s happening all over again.
Please note the language and tone already established in this Website. This is not the place to stack up vulgar one-liners and crude rejoinders. While you may support, oppose or introduce any position or argument, your comments must meet our standards of logical rigor and of civil discourse. We will not participate in trading insults, and we will not tolerate participants trading insults with each other. Participants should not be thin-skinned or over sensitive to criticism, but should be prepared to defend their arguments when challenged. If you don’t really have a coherent argument or counter-argument of your own, sit down and don’t embarrass yourself. If you have something serious to contribute to the conversation, please keep it civil. We apologize to religious conservative thinkers for the need to even say these things.
Like this page on FaceBook.
Free E-Zine subscription - each time anything new is published in this site, recieve it in your e-mail.