Obamunist Selective Law Enforcement, Vs. Sheriff Joe Arpaio & old fashioned Honor.
Vic Biorseth, Thursday, August 25, 2011
http://www.Thinking-Catholic-Strategic-Center.com
This came into my email this morning.
Did you see this?
“Bowing to pressure from immigrant rights activists, the Obama administration said Thursday that it will halt deportation proceedings on a case-by-case basis against illegal immigrants who meet certain criteria, such as attending school, having family in the military or having primary responsible for other family members’ care.” – Washington Post, August 19, 2011.
Translated, this means the administration will grant backdoor amnesty to illegal immigrants by making changes to internal enforcement policies rather than an act of Congress.
Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano even had the audacity to say, “This case-by-case approach will enhance public safety.”
So while the Obama administration seeks to grant a back-door amnesty program to those who break the law – they come after me for enforcing existing immigration laws!
How, you might ask? Barack Obama’s Justice Department has sued me for enforcing illegal immigration laws here in Arizona … They even opened a “civil rights” investigation into my policies …They even worked hand-in-hand with the ultra-liberal ACLU to bring a lawsuit against Arizona for passing a tough anti-illegal immigration law.
You have been such a staunch supporter of my campaign for re-election as Sheriff, so I’m writing to you again today to ask for your help.

I won’t be intimated by the Obama Justice Department … just as I won’t be intimated by the Mexican Drug Cartel’s placing a $1 MILLION bounty on my head … and just as I won’t be intimated by the daily death threats I receive … all for doing the job I was elected to do!
Nothing – not even Barack Obama’s back-door amnesty scheme – will keep me from doing my job of enforcing the laws on the books. Our great nation was founded on the rule of law – not of men!
I made it clear that the Justice Department can make whatever threats they want to, but I swore an oath to protect and defend the Constitutions of both the state of Arizona and the United States. As long as the laws are on the books, I’m going to enforce them unapologetically.
But I desperately need your help. It's going to take a lot of resources to combat the attacks and false allegations against me and my deputies. We anticipate a very expensive campaign to defend myself and my record.
I cannot compete with the local and national media machines that distort my record and the job I’m doing to protect this country. And, I don’t have the personal resources to defend myself from these vicious attacks. I have to go directly to the people for their support. I need good people like you in this country to stand behind me and help me fight this fight.
Sincerely,
Sheriff Joe Arpaio
Maricopa County, Arizona
For the record, all criminal aliens are already criminals; they have purposely broken the laws of at least two countries just to get here, and they purposely violate our law every day that they remain here. Those who knowingly and purposely enable them, educate them, treat them, employ them or otherwise help them are complicit in the crime itself. Perhaps they, too, should be deported after serving time. Selective law enforcement – the refusal of an executive to enforce legislated or Constitutional law – is a direct violation of an oath of office and a purposeful violation of the responsibilities of high office.
Look at the bigger picture, at what Obamunism is really after.
A nation without definable borders ceases to be a nation.
Is there any part of that you don’t understand? Does anyone not get it yet?
Comrade Obama, peace be upon him, holds himself to be above the law, and even to be the law.
He already considers himself our dictator.
Reference Material
Return to Web Site Log (Blog) page
Return to HOME PAGE
Build/Host/Maintain Your Own Personal Website using SBI! (Advertisement)
Comments
Please note the language and tone already established in this Website. This is not the place to stack up vulgar one-liners and crude rejoinders. While you may support, oppose or introduce any position or argument, your comments must meet our standards of logical rigor and of civil discourse. We will not participate in trading insults, and we will not tolerate participants trading insults with each other. Participants should not be thin-skinned or over sensitive to criticism, but should be prepared to defend their arguments when challenged. If you don’t really have a coherent argument or counter-argument of your own, sit down and don’t embarrass yourself. If you have something serious to contribute to the conversation, please keep it civil. We apologize to religious conservative thinkers for the need to even say these things.
|